That’s fair, John. I wouldn’t necessarily consider him far right and could have had a more focused critique of his positions since his name is in the title.

In my opinion, his historical analysis is incredibly weak, he’s got ‘west is best’ blinders in all areas when commenting on politics, economics, and the general state of the world, and, beyond some basic psychological self-help-life-is-suffering truths, he hurts the general discourse.

I think, in a semi-coherent west/anglosphere, he would have never popped into the mainstream and never been even remotely considered as the west’s most important ‘intellectual.’

Again, just my opinion. But thanks for the read, the words, the fair critique, and stiiiiiill enjoying my writing.

One love