Come on, Will. Evidence is the name of the game. Again, you're going on complete conjecture.

Yes, there was a Russian disinformation campaign online to sow confusion and doubt. I say so in the piece. Also, Manafort and Stone are super shady characters that could get picked up at any moment for any number of lies or sketchy dealings.

Wikileaks is an independent entity and Assange has always said he didn't get anything from Russia. Crowdstrike even admitted it had no evidence Russia hacked the DNC. And if Russia could hack the DNC, why would they need polling data from an inept Team Trump?

Manafort met Konstantin Kilimnik, who was a 'valuable asset' for the American embassy in Kiev. If he's a super-spy why isn't that a storyline we pursue?

It is grasping at straws. A two-year investigation by Mueller showed there wasn't much of a there there.